ArticleBrain & spine2025
Diagnosis and management of de novo non-specific spinal infections: European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) Spine Section Delphi consensus recommendations.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spondylodiscitis: a call for unified guidelines.European radiology · 2026Review
- Osteomyelitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Diagnostic value of percutaneous paramedian small-angle lateral intervertebral foramen Kambin's triangle approach for lumbar puncture biopsy combined with tNGS-based multimodal etiological diagnosis in early spinal infection: a multicenter retrospective diagnostic yield study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Outcomes and factors associated with medical treatment failure in patients with spinal epidural abscess: A 14-year experience.PloS one · 2026Article
- Management and outcome of whole-spine epidural abscesses - institutional case series and systematic review.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of de novo non-specific spinal infections (spondylodiscitis - SD) remains inconsistent due to varying clinical practices and a lack of high-level evidence, particularly regarding the indications for surgery. Research question: This study aims to develop consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of SD, addressing diagnostic modalities, surgical indications, and treatment strategies. Material and methods: A Delphi process was conducted with 26 experts from the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). Sixtytwo statements were developed on diagnostic workup, management decisions, surgical techniques, non-surgical treatment, and follow-up and submitted to the panel of experts. Results: Consensus was reached on 38 of 62 statements. MRI was confirmed as the gold standard for diagnosis. Regarding surgical indications, the panel agreed that any new neurological deficit, even subtle, warrants surgical consideration. Motor deficits with a motor score (MRC) below 4 and bladder or bowel dysfunction were unanimously considered clear indications for surgery. For spinal deformity and instability, thresholds such as kyphosis >20°, scoliosis >10°, and vertebral body collapse >50% were established to guide surgical decision-making. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was endorsed whenever feasible, and a 12 week antibiotic treatment regimen was favored in cases of complicated infections. Discussion and conclusion: This EANS consensus provides updated recommendations for SD management, incorporating recent evidence on improved outcomes with surgical therapy. While these guidelines offer a more structured approach to clinical decision-making, further research is required to optimize surgical timing and validate the long-term impact of these treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.