ArticleOphthalmology science
Multimodal Deep Learning for Differentiating Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Prospective Representative Data.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leakage-Aware Visit-Level Benchmarking Reveals Representational Overlap in Deep Learning for Bacterial Versus Fungal Keratitis Classification.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Latent Supervision: A Method for Improved Performance and Calibration of Machine Learning Classification Models in Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Guidance in Ocular Surface Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in microbial keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in refractive surgery: progress, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Applications of Computer Vision for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study develops and evaluates multimodal machine learning models for differentiating bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective representative dataset from South India. Design: Machine learning classifier training and validation study. Participants: Five hundred ninety-nine subjects diagnosed with acute infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India. Methods: We developed and compared 3 prediction models to distinguish bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective, consecutively-collected, representative dataset gathered over a full calendar year (the MADURAI dataset). These models included a clinical data model, a computer vision model using the EfficientNet architecture, and a multimodal model combining both imaging and clinical data. We partitioned the MADURAI dataset into 70% train/validation and 30% test sets. Model training was performed with fivefold cross-validation. We also compared the performance of the MADURAI-trained computer vision model against a model with identical architecture but trained on a preexisting dataset collated from multiple prior bacterial and fungal keratitis randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (the RCT-trained computer vision model). Main Outcome Measures: The primary evaluation metric was the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Secondary metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, and F1 score. Results: The MADURAI-trained computer vision model outperformed the clinical data model and the RCT-trained computer vision model on the hold-out test set, with an AUPRC 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.96), AUROC 0.81 (0.76-0.85), accuracy 77%, and F1 score 0.85. The multimodal model did not substantially improve performance compared with the computer vision model. Conclusions: The best-performing machine learning classifier for infectious keratitis was a computer vision model trained using the MADURAI dataset. These findings suggest that image-based deep learning could significantly enhance diagnostic capabilities for infectious keratitis and emphasize the importance of using prospective, consecutively-collected, representative data for machine learning model training and evaluation. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.