ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Time-lag effects of NEP and NPP to meteorological factors in the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanisms of terrestrial carbon sinks in Jiangxi Province, subtropical China.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Policy-driven carbon sink enhancement in dryland cities: a case study of Urumqi, a core city on China's New Silk Road.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetation productivity and ecosystem carbon sink capacity are significantly influenced by seasonal weather patterns. The time lags between changes in these patterns and ecosystem (including vegetation) responses is a critical aspect in vegetation-climate and ecosystem-climate interactions. These lags can vary considerably due to the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and ecosystems. In this study focused on the source regions of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers (SCRYR), we utilized long-term datasets of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) and model-estimated Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP) from2015 to 2020, combined with reconstructed 8-day scale climate sequences, to conduct partial correlation regression analysis (isolating the influence of individual meteorological factors on the lag effects). The study found that the length of lag effects varies depending on regional topography, vegetation types, and the sensitivity of their ecological environments to changes in meteorological factors. In the source region of the Yangtze River (SCR), the lag times for NPP and NEP in response to temperature (Tem) are longer, compared to the source region of the Yellow River (SYR), where the lags are generally less than 10 days. The long lag effects of NPP with precipitation (Pre), ranging from 50 to 60 days, were primarily concentrated in the northwestern part of the SCR, while the long lag effects of NEP with precipitation, ranging from 34 to 48 days, covered a broad region in the western part of the study area. NPP exhibits the least sensitivity to changes in solar radiation (SR), with lag times exceeding 54 days in 99.30% of the region. In contrast, NEP showed varying lag effects with respect to SR: short lag effects (ranging from 0 to 15 days) were observed in carbon source areas, while long lag effects (ranging from 55 to 64 days) were evident in carbon sink areas. The sensitivity of vegetation to meteorological changes is highest for SVL, followed by C3A, PW, BDS, and C3 in descending order. This study examined the spatiotemporal impacts of climatic drivers on NPP and NEP from both vegetation and ecosystem perspectives. The findings are crucial for enhancing vegetation productivity and ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity at important water sources in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.