ArticleReumatologia2024
Frequency and factors associated with loss to follow-up in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patient: a single-centre study.
Article in Reumatologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visit adherence and clinical, inflammatory, and patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Hidden disabilities in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease: an invisible barrier to daily functioning and healthcare accessibility.EULAR rheumatology open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lost to follow-up (LTFU) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients constitute a population that potentially experiences worsening of their disease. This study aimed to determine the frequency of LTFU and the possible associated factors in newly diagnosed RA patients in our outpatient clinic. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 260 newly diagnosed RA patients. Those who did not attend their scheduled appointment for more than 3 months were defined as LTFU. We used a Likert scale questionnaire to explore the perception and the possible reasons for LTFU by phone. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the factors associated with LTFU. Results: There were 65 patients (25%) who were LTFU. We contacted 34 of them and selected 34 age-matched routinely followed-up (RFU) patients as controls. The reasons for LTFU were distance from house to hospital constraints (76%), busy (56%), transportation constraints (38%), dissatisfaction with the outpatient clinic service (21%), lack of information about their disease (18%), having other comorbidities that compelled them to go to another department's clinic (15%), difficulties understanding the clinic registration flow system (9%), and having minimal symptoms (6%). Using the χ Conclusions: Among newly diagnosed RA patients, 65 (25%) were LTFU. Transportation constraints and busyness were factors associated with LTFU. Further multivariate analysis showed that the factor transportation constraints was significantly associated with LTFU of RA patients in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.