ReviewReumatologia2024
Osteoporosis in axial radiographic spondyloarthritis: diagnostic limitations of bone mineral density and the need for comprehensive fracture risk assessment.
Review in Reumatologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Prevalence and relative risk of fractures and osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- The Impact of CT Imaging on the Diagnosis of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: An Observational Prospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ambiguities in the effect of physical activity on bone remodelling in spondyloarthritis.Reumatologia · 2026Review
- Article
- Utility of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-spectrometry in Evaluating Bone Health in Patients With Spondylarthritis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Utility of the Fragility Score (FS) Determined Through Radiofrequency Ecographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) in the Follow-Up of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring Causality Between Bone Mineral Density and Cervical Spondylosis: Bidirectional and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial radiographic spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease that leads to a considerable decline in the quality of life of patients by impairment of function and mobility, which, in turn, brings about a deterioration of both physical and mental health. Osteoporosis (OP) is a significant issue in the course of r-axSpA. Fractures resulting from OP complicate the treatment of the underlying disease and reduce the quality of life of patients. The aim of this paper is to discuss currently available diagnostic methods for OP and highlight why the gold standard for diagnosis - the assessment of bone mineral density via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry - is not sufficient for patients with r-axSpA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.