ArticleAME case reports2025
Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- STUMP Swiftly Followed by Large Adenomyoma in a Young Nulliparous Patient.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A newly identified allelic mutation c.110C>T in theGynecology and pelvic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uterine cystic adenomyosis (CA) is a unique form of adenomyosis with a single or fused lumen of the cystic space exceeding a diameter of 1 cm that typically results in progressively worsening dysmenorrhea. In most cases, the prognosis and pregnancy outcomes of CA remained unclear, and therefore further studies are warranted. Case Description: A 19‑year‑old woman was admitted for irregular vaginal bleeding that lasted for more than one month. Transabdominal B-ultrasound examination revealed a hypoechoic nodule measuring approximately 4.8 cm × 3.9 cm × 4.9 cm that is situated on the posterior wall of the uterus, in close proximity to the uterine fundus. The preoperative diagnosis was concluded as a pelvic mass with a cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level of 51.48 U/mL. She accepted a laparoscopic myomectomy and the CA lesion crossing the myometrium was removed. During operation, dense adhesions were found among a portion of the colorectum, omentum, uterus and bilateral adnexal areas. A cystic mass of approximately 7.0 cm × 5.0 cm × 4.0 cm was visible in the posterior wall of the uterus, and a sinus of approximately 1.0 cm in diameter was found to be connected to the uterine cavity at the lower posterior wall of the uterus, and the cystic wall was attached to the endometrium. Based on the classification criteria of MUSCLE (myometrial location, uterine site, structure, contents, level, endometrial or inner lining), the current case is classified as an A1-B1 mixed type. Following surgery, GnRH-a consolidation therapy was applied for 3 months. Such treatment relieved her symptoms and improved her quality of life while preserving her reproductive function. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of an A1-B1 mixed type CA that was successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery supplemented with GnRH-a consolidation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.