ArticleAME case reports2025
Electrical storm caused by sertraline overdose: case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In cases of electrical storm, identifying the etiology is essential, as patients with reversible causes do not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Given the diversity of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management tools available for hemodynamically unstable patients in electrical storm, all must be considered and tailored to each individual patient. Case Description: This report describes a 36-year-old female without prior cardiac history who presented in ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. While she lacked significant electrolyte abnormalities or ischemia to explain etiology of electrical storm, she incidentally had variant coronary anatomy noted on angiography. After thorough consideration of possible etiologies of storm, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) intoxication was the most highly suspected etiology. Regarding management of her hemodynamically unstable electrical storm, she was treated with lidocaine, amiodarone, as well as mechanical circulatory support devices including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The patient ultimately was decannulated from ECMO, had IABP removal, and achieved recovery of ejection fraction (EF) to baseline. She was not offered ICD as the etiology of her cardiac arrest was reversable. She was discharged with recommendation to discontinue SSRI and follow up with psychiatry regarding SSRI overdose. Conclusions: Identification of electrical storm etiology is crucial as reversible causes do not warrant ICD placement. Selection of appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management in the hemodynamically unstable electrical storm patient is important given the wide range of available options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.