ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2025
Known yet underdiagnosed: Invasive assessment of coronary microvascular disease and its implications.
Article in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive ability of microvascular resistance reserve for periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Microvascular Dysfunction as a Bridge between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Ischemic Events : Microvascular Dysfunction linking COPD and Ischemic.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is one of the commonest causes of cardiac chest pain. The condition is more prevalent in women, and incidence is known to increase with age, hypertension, and diabetes. The pathophysiological pathways are heterogenous and related to intrinsic vascular and endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, this entity is known to be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Despite this, there is inertia amongst cardiologists to further evaluate patients with non-critical coronary artery disease and suspected CMD. With refinement in technology, we have now better understanding of CMD and invasive testing in the catheterization laboratory is a viable option for confirming the diagnosis of CMD. However, despite advances in diagnosing and stratifying this entity, therapeutic options remain limited and poorly defined. In this editorial, we will briefly focus on the pathophysiology and invasive assessment and therapeutic options available for CMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.