ArticleMethodsX2025
MBCdeg4: A modified clustering-based method for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA-seq is a commonly employed methodology for the measurement of transcriptomes, particularly for the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different conditions or groups. In a previous report, we described a clustering-based method for identifying DEGs, designated MBCdeg1 and MBCdeg2. and a modified version, MBCdeg3. This study presents a further improved version, designated MBCdeg4. The four versions of MBCdeg employ an R package, designated MBCluster.Seq, internally. The sole distinction between them is the manner of data normalization. MBCdeg4 employs normalization factors derived from a robust normalization algorithm, designated as DEGES. Seven competing methods were compared: the four versions of MBCdeg and three conventional R packages (edgeR, DESeq2, and TCC). MBCdeg4 demonstrated superior performance in a multitude of simulation scenarios involving RNA-seq count data. Therefore, MBCdeg4 is recommended for use in preference to the earlier versions, MBCdeg1-3.•MBCdeg4 is a method for both identification and classification of DEGs from RNA-seq count data.•MBCdeg4 is available as an R function and performs well in a wide variety of simulation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.