ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2025
Central Corneal Subepithelial Haze Following Keratoplasty With Interrupted Sutures: A Novel Clinical Finding.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to describe a newly identified clinical finding of central corneal subepithelial haze following keratoplasty (both penetrating and lamellar) with interrupted sutures, and to explore its causes and management strategies. Methods: Case series. Results: The study included 7 males and 3 females, with an average age of 24.89 ± 6.57 years. Eight eyes underwent lamellar keratoplasty, and two underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Subepithelial haze appeared between 2 and 5 months postoperatively, associated with central corneal steepening. The mean BCVA improved from 0.88 ± 0.50 logMAR preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.20 at haze documentation and 0.50 ± 0.16 after haze resolution. Selective suture removal resulted in haze resolution in 9 eyes, while delayed intervention in one case led to permanent scarring. Conclusion: Central corneal subepithelial haze following keratoplasty with interrupted sutures is linked to suture tension and central corneal steepening. Early suture adjustment or removal is essential to prevent permanent scarring. Further studies are needed to better understand this complication's pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.