ReviewChemical Society reviews2025
Negative gas adsorption transitions and pressure amplification phenomena in porous frameworks.
Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ligand Geometry Regulated Architecture of Ultra-Microporous Flexible Guanidinium-Based Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Highly Selective Nitrous Oxide/Nitrogen Separation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Gas Sorption Measurements in MOFsA Tutorial for Beginners.ACS materials Au · 2026Article
- Dynamic guanidinium sulfate salt for selective carbon dioxide adsorption with negative pressure inflexion.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoporous solids offer a wide range of functionalities for industrial, environmental, and energy applications. However, only a limited number of porous materials are responsive,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.