Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865928›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Islam Alfreahat, Hamdi Nsairat, Ibrahim Deeb Aldeeb, Ali Al-Samydai, Walhan Alshaer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Islam AlfreahatPharmacological and Diagnostic Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Hamdi NsairatPharmacological and Diagnostic Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-5916-5879
Ibrahim Deeb AldeebPharmacological and Diagnostic Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Ali Al-SamydaiPharmacological and Diagnostic Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Walhan AlshaerCell Therapy Center, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoxorubicin (DOX) is a potent chemotherapeutic agent for breast cancer, but its effectiveness is often diminished by resistance mechanisms, particularly through p-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated drug efflux. Clarithromycin (CAM), a macrolide antibiotic, inhibits multiple metabolic pathways including CYP3A and P-gp, potentially countering DOX resistance.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the potentiation of DOX and its effectiveness against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line by encapsulating both DOX and CAM in PEGylated liposomes.

methodsPEGylated liposomes containing DOX and CAM were prepared using the thin film hydration method. The physicochemical properties of the liposomes, including average particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential, were characterized. Encapsulation efficiencies for CAM and DOX were assessed, and stability of the liposomes was evaluated over 9 days at room temperature. Cell viability was measured using an IC

resultsThe CAM/DOX-PEGylated liposomes exhibited optimal average particle size (238 ± 26.7 nm), PDI (0.29 ± 0.107), and zeta potential (-20.9 ± 2.17 mV). These liposomes maintained good stability regarding size and charge over 9 days. Encapsulation efficiencies were 81.05% for CAM and 78.13% for DOX. The IC50 value for CAM/DOX-PEGylated liposomes was 0.13 µM, representing a significant reduction compared to the physical mixture of CAM and DOX (0.25 µM) and free DOX (0.21 µM) against MCF-7 cells. ELISA analysis showed a reduction in P-gp expression of approximately 5% with CAM/DOX-PEGylated liposomes compared to 1.61% with free DOX.

conclusionThe results indicate that CAM encapsulated in PEGylated liposomes enhances the effectiveness of DOX against breast cancer cells, likely through the inhibition of p-glycoprotein. This approach may offer a promising strategy to overcome DOX resistance and improve chemotherapy outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsClarithromycinDoxorubicinLiposomesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Cell SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsParticle SizePolyethylene GlycolsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ClarithromycinDoxorubicinLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsclarithromycincytotoxicitydoxorubicinPEGylated liposomesp-gp inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39865928
PMCPMC11770720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.