Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865906›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025

The 9/3 Min Running Test: A Simple and Practical Approach to Estimate the Critical and Maximal Aerobic Power.

Santiago A Ruiz-Alias, Aitor Marcos-Blanco, Iván Fernández-Navarrete, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla, Felipe García-Pinillos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santiago A Ruiz-AliasDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-979X
Aitor Marcos-BlancoDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Iván Fernández-NavarreteDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Alejandro Pérez-CastillaDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-2087
Felipe García-PinillosDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-8234

Funding

Ministerio de Universidades FPU19/00542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity of the linear critical power (CP) and Peronnet models to estimate the power output associated with the second ventilatory threshold (VT2) and the maximal aerobic power (MAP) using two-time trials. Nineteen recreational runners (10 males and 9 females and maximum oxygen uptake: 53.0 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min) performed a graded exercise test (GXT) to determine the VT2 and MAP. On a second test, athletes performed two-time trials of 9 and 3 min interspaced by 30 min. The CP was determined from the linear CP model and compared with the power output associated with the VT2. The MAP was determined from the linear Peronnet model, established at 7 min, and compared with the MAP determined in the GXT. The CP model was valid for determining the VT2, regardless of sex (p = 0.130; 9/3 vs. GXT: 3.5 [-1.1 to 8.2] W). The MAP was overestimated (p = 0.015) specifically in males (9/3 vs. GXT: 9.2 [3.3 to 15.1] W) rather than in females (p = 9/3 vs. GXT: 1.7 [-4.4 to 8.0] W). Therefore, MAP estimates were determined introducing the CP and W' parameters to a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. For females, the CP was the unique significant predictor of MAP (p < 0.001) explaining 96.7% of the variance. In males, both CP and W' were significant predictors of MAP (p < 0.001) explaining 97.7% of the variance. Practitioners can validly estimate the VT2 and MAP through a practical testing protocol in both male and female recreational runners.

Indexed as

Exercise TestOxygen ConsumptionRunningAdultFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleSex FactorsYoung Adultmodellingrunningsevere intensity domaintraining

Identifiers

PMID39865906
PMCPMC11770271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.