Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865699›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025

Bipartite interference and air pollution transport: estimating health effects of power plant interventions.

Corwin Zigler, Vera Liu, Fabrizia Mealli, Laura Forastiere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Mechanistic Model of Annual Sulfate Concentrations in the United States.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022
    Article
  6. A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corwin ZiglerDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health 121 S. Main St, Providence, RI 02903, United States.
Vera LiuDepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 105 E 24th St D9800, Austin, TX 78705, United States.
Fabrizia MealliDepartment of Economics, European University Institute, Via delle Fontanelle 18, Florence, Tuscany 50014, Italy.
Laura ForastiereDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT06511, United States.

Funding

Developing causal inference methods to evaluate and leverage spillover effects through social Interactions for designing improved HIV prevention interventionsR01MH134715 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Forastiere · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Causal Inference with Interference for Evaluating Air Quality PoliciesR01ES026217 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZIGLER, CORWIN MATTHEW · 2016 to 2021
$2.2M
Dipartimenti EccellentiEUI Research CouncilItalian Ministerial FundsNIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026217NIH HHS R01ES026217NIH HHS R01MH134715NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134715US EPA 83587201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating air quality interventions is confronted with the challenge of interference since interventions at a particular pollution source likely impact air quality and health at distant locations, and air quality and health at any given location are likely impacted by interventions at many sources. The structure of interference in this context is dictated by complex atmospheric processes governing how pollution emitted from a particular source is transformed and transported across space and can be cast with a bipartite structure reflecting the two distinct types of units: (i) interventional units on which treatments are applied or withheld to change pollution emissions; and (ii) outcome units on which outcomes of primary interest are measured. We propose new estimands for bipartite causal inference with interference that construe two components of treatment: a "key-associated" (or "individual") treatment and an "upwind" (or "neighborhood") treatment. Estimation is carried out using a covariate adjustment approach based on a joint propensity score. A reduced-complexity atmospheric model characterizes the structure of the interference network by modeling the movement of air parcels through time and space. The new methods are deployed to evaluate the effectiveness of installing flue-gas desulfurization scrubbers on 472 coal-burning power plants (the interventional units) in reducing Medicare hospitalizations among 21,577,552 Medicare beneficiaries residing across 25,553 ZIP codes in the United States (the outcome units).

Indexed as

Air PollutionModels, StatisticalPower PlantsHumansair pollutioncausal inferencegeneralized propensity scoresnetwork interferencepower plants

Identifiers

PMID39865699
PMCPMC11823286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.