ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Refinement of Atomic Polarizabilities for a Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field with Simultaneous Considerations of Both Molecular Polarizability Tensors and In-Solution Electrostatic Potentials.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capturing Carbohydrate Conformations and Hydration Interactions with a Polarizable Bond Dipole Potential.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DEGAUSS: A Novel Softcore Force Field Using Double Exponential van der Waals and Gaussian Charge for Molecular Dynamics Simulations I: Theory and Validation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Optimization of Lennard-Jones Parameters for Induced Dipole Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Automated Refinement of Property-Specific Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Water Models Using Bayesian Black-Box Optimization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atomic polarizabilities are considered to be fundamental parameters in polarizable molecular mechanical force fields that play pivotal roles in determining model transferability across different electrostatic environments. In an earlier work, the atomic polarizabilities were obtained by fitting them to the B3LYP/aug-cc-pvtz molecular polarizability tensors of mainly small molecules. Taking advantage of the recent PCMRESPPOL method, we refine the atomic polarizabilities for condensed-phase simulations using a polarizable Gaussian Multipole (pGM) force field. Departing from earlier works, in this work, we incorporated polarizability tensors of a large number of dimers and electrostatic potentials (ESPs) in multiple solvents. We calculated 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and dimers of noble gas and small molecules and 4742 × 4 ESPs of small molecule dimers in four solvents (diethyl ether, ε = 4.24, dichloroethane, ε = 10.13, acetone, ε = 20.49, and water, ε = 78.36). For the gas-phase polarizability tensors, we supplemented the molecule set that was used in our earlier work by adding both the 4252 monomer and dimer sets studied by Shaw and co-workers and the 7211 small molecule monomers listed in the QM7b database to a combined total of 13,523 molecular polarizability tensors of monomers and dimers. The QM7b polarizability set was obtained from quantum-machine.org and was calculated at the LR-CCSD/d-aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory. All other polarizability tensors and all ESPs were calculated at the ωB97X-D/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. The atomic polarizabilities were developed using all polarizability tensors and the 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and were then assessed by comparing them to the 4742 × 4 ab initio ESPs of small molecule dimers. The predicted dimer ESPs had an average relative root-mean-square error (RRMSE) of 9.30%, which was only slightly larger than the average fitting RRMSE of 9.15% of the monomer ESPs. The transferability of the polarizability set was further evaluated by comparing the ESPs calculated using parameters developed in another dielectric environment for both tetrapeptide and DES monomer data sets. It was observed that the polarizabilities of this work retained or slightly improved the transferability over the one discussed in earlier work even though the number of parameters in the present set is about half of that in the earlier set. Excluding the gas-phase data, for the DES monomer set, the average transfer RRMSEs were 16.25% and 10.83% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, comparable to the average fitting RRMSEs of 16.03% and 10.54%; for tetrapeptides, the average transfer RRMSEs were 5.62% and 3.95% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, slightly larger than 5.41% and 3.61% of the fitting RRMSEs. Therefore, we conclude that the pGM methods with updated polarizabilities achieved remarkable transferability from monomer to dimer and from one solvent to another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.