Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865620›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Refinement of Atomic Polarizabilities for a Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field with Simultaneous Considerations of Both Molecular Polarizability Tensors and In-Solution Electrostatic Potentials.

Yong Duan, Junmei Wang, Piotr Cieplak, Ray Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong DuanUC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-5099
Junmei WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8229
Piotr CieplakSBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0700-5691
Ray LuoDepartments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-8271

Funding

AMBER force field consortium: a coherent biomolecular simulation platformR01GM079383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CIEPLAK, PIOTR, DUAN, YONG · 2007 to 2017
$4.7M
Multi-scaled Modeling of Electrostatic and Polarization Effects in BiomoleculesR35GM130367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI RAY LUO · 2019 to 2026
$3.0M
New Generation of General AMBER Force Field for Biomedical ResearchR01GM147673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, JUNMEI, YANG, WEI · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079383NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147673NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic polarizabilities are considered to be fundamental parameters in polarizable molecular mechanical force fields that play pivotal roles in determining model transferability across different electrostatic environments. In an earlier work, the atomic polarizabilities were obtained by fitting them to the B3LYP/aug-cc-pvtz molecular polarizability tensors of mainly small molecules. Taking advantage of the recent PCMRESPPOL method, we refine the atomic polarizabilities for condensed-phase simulations using a polarizable Gaussian Multipole (pGM) force field. Departing from earlier works, in this work, we incorporated polarizability tensors of a large number of dimers and electrostatic potentials (ESPs) in multiple solvents. We calculated 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and dimers of noble gas and small molecules and 4742 × 4 ESPs of small molecule dimers in four solvents (diethyl ether, ε = 4.24, dichloroethane, ε = 10.13, acetone, ε = 20.49, and water, ε = 78.36). For the gas-phase polarizability tensors, we supplemented the molecule set that was used in our earlier work by adding both the 4252 monomer and dimer sets studied by Shaw and co-workers and the 7211 small molecule monomers listed in the QM7b database to a combined total of 13,523 molecular polarizability tensors of monomers and dimers. The QM7b polarizability set was obtained from quantum-machine.org and was calculated at the LR-CCSD/d-aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory. All other polarizability tensors and all ESPs were calculated at the ωB97X-D/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. The atomic polarizabilities were developed using all polarizability tensors and the 1565 × 4 ESPs of small molecule monomers and were then assessed by comparing them to the 4742 × 4 ab initio ESPs of small molecule dimers. The predicted dimer ESPs had an average relative root-mean-square error (RRMSE) of 9.30%, which was only slightly larger than the average fitting RRMSE of 9.15% of the monomer ESPs. The transferability of the polarizability set was further evaluated by comparing the ESPs calculated using parameters developed in another dielectric environment for both tetrapeptide and DES monomer data sets. It was observed that the polarizabilities of this work retained or slightly improved the transferability over the one discussed in earlier work even though the number of parameters in the present set is about half of that in the earlier set. Excluding the gas-phase data, for the DES monomer set, the average transfer RRMSEs were 16.25% and 10.83% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, comparable to the average fitting RRMSEs of 16.03% and 10.54%; for tetrapeptides, the average transfer RRMSEs were 5.62% and 3.95% for pGM-ind and pGM-perm methods, respectively, slightly larger than 5.41% and 3.61% of the fitting RRMSEs. Therefore, we conclude that the pGM methods with updated polarizabilities achieved remarkable transferability from monomer to dimer and from one solvent to another.

Indexed as

Static ElectricityDimerizationNormal DistributionSolutionsSolventsSolutionsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID39865620
PMCPMC11815842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.