ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2025
The Effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Human Sex Ratios.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern assisted reproductive technology (ART), including pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has opened new avenues in understanding early embryonic events and has simultaneously raised questions about the impact of ART itself on sex ratios.
aimsThe primary aim was to investigate whether patient demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation protocols or laboratory characteristics in ART influence sex ratios. The secondary aim was to relate the blastocyst sex ratio (BSR) to the corresponding secondary sex ratio (SSR) in our patient cohort. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study on consecutive PGT-A cycles from January 2019 to February 2022. We analysed demographic data, stimulation protocols, laboratory characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.
resultsThe euploidy rate was 45.1% (2608/5777), BSR 1.07 and euploid BSR 1.03. There was no statistical difference in the ploidy status of XX and XY blastocysts and on multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no association between euploidy and BSR or any other variables examined, including female age and stimulation protocol. The SSR was 1.02 (1294 embryo transfers) with no statistical difference in biochemical pregnancy (p = 0.41), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.56), miscarriage (p = 0.65) or live birth rates (p = 0.40) based on embryo sex.
conclusionsOur study indicates that the euploid BSR is not skewed by sex, and there is no relationship between BSR and euploidy, patient characteristics or stimulation protocols. Pregnancy outcomes did not vary by sex, and the SSR was consistent with the SSR of the general Australian population at birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.