Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865432›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Interprofessional and Inter-Organisational Collaboration in the COVID-19 Vaccination Programme: Lessons From North Central London.

Helen T Allan, Sophia Drakopoulou, Miranda Willis, Michael Traynor, Deborah Scott, Fiona Suthers, Karen Colfer, Dan Levene

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helen T AllanFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9391-0385
Sophia DrakopoulouFaculty of the Arts and Creative Industries, Middlesex University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5733-4381
Miranda WillisNorth Central London Secondary Care Covid-19 Vaccination Lead, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael TraynorFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Deborah ScottNorth Central London Clinical Programme Lead for Covid-19 Vaccination, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fiona SuthersDepartment of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Middlesex University, London, UK.
Karen ColferUCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dan LeveneNCL ICB, London, UK.

Funding

North Central London Integrated Care Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo discuss inter-organisational collaboration in the context of the successful COVID-19 vaccination programme in North Central London (NCL).

designAn action research study in 2023-2024.

methodsSix action research cycles used mixed qualitative methods.

resultsFour findings are presented which illustrate inter-organisational collaboration across professional and organisational boundaries: working in the action research group, learning to work as an action research group, working collaboratively in new ways, working outside professional, occupational and organisational silos. These themes are discussed in relation to the literature on interprofessional and inter-organisational collaboration.

conclusionThe COVID-19 vaccination programme offered a way out of the pandemic. Between December 2020 and February 2022, 2.8 M people were vaccinated by the NCL Vaccination team in an example of inter-organisational collaboration between science, health and community. Staff on the vaccination programme worked inter-organisationally in new ways to achieve this. In NCL several thousand local residents joined the NHS to work with healthcare professionals including nurses, nursing associates and students to deliver the programme in new ways which are illustrative of inter-organisational collaboration. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No PPI within this study. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The implications for the profession and for healthcare organisations of the findings are that, in contrast to traditional ways of working which have been entrenched in silos of professional knowledge and expertise, health professionals are able to work in new ways and find inter-organisational work satisfying. This has implications for patients as it has the potential to improve communication between very different organisations and as the vaccination programme shows, results in successful public health vaccination rates. IMPACT: This study set out to create a public resource for learning (for future pandemics or other works of national effort) to commemorate the collaborative efforts of the diverse vaccination workforce and volunteers involved in the programme. Participation in the COVID-19 vaccination programme had a profound effect on NHS clinical and professional staff, on partners across business and volunteer organisation in North Central London and on volunteers from the public in North Central London. Inter-organisation collaboration has been sustained after the delivery of the vaccination programme in North Central London; innovative ways of working have been introduced in the local community to deliver ongoing vaccinations and wider prevention activities and the partnership between academia and clinical practice. The research findings have had an impact on the research participants and the wider public through the website created as a public resource to commemorate the COVID-19 vaccination programme in North Central London. REPORTING

methodThe consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) was used as a guide throughout data collection and analysis. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The public were involved as participants in this study. They did not participate in the study design.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization ProgramsInterprofessional RelationsIntersectoral CollaborationHumansLondonProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID‐19 vaccination programmeinter‐organisational collaborationinterprofessional collaboration

Identifiers

PMID39865432
PMCPMC12460938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.