Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865379›Full record

ArticleJournal of renal care2025

Exploring Haemodialysis Nurses' Perceptions on Kidney Replacement Therapy Modality Education: A Framework Analysis.

Elke Jaibeeh Barah, Jennifer Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of renal care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elke Jaibeeh BarahFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer JacksonFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-761X

Funding

Funding for this study was received from the Canadian Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technologists.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with kidney failure start and remain on in-centre haemodialysis treatment despite evidence of improved outcomes with home dialysis. To make an informed modality decision patients must receive frequent, high-quality modality education. This education is inconsistent in the in-centre haemodialysis setting, where patients spend the most time with nurses while receiving haemodialysis treatments.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine in-centre haemodialysis nurses' perceptions around modality education for patients receiving in-centre haemodialysis using the COM-B model of behaviour change.

designWe used framework analysis as a research method, applying the COM-B model as a theoretical framework to understand nurses' perceptions of modality education.

participantsWe interviewed 13 in-centre haemodialysis nurses in a single province in Canada. APPROACH: We completed semi-structured interviews via Zoom, which ranged from 30 to 60 min.

findingsParticipants reported knowledge deficits, lack of experience or exposure to other dialysis modalities, and lack of resources to support modality education practices. In-centre haemodialysis nurses reported some factors that enhanced modality education, including strong nurse-patient therapeutic relationships and previous experience in other dialysis modalities.

conclusionsNurses could have a role in modality education but had different views on what this role should be. Nurses faced barriers in modality education such as knowledge deficits, a lack of experience with home modalities, and limited patient teaching resources. Factors that favoured modality education were strong nurse-patient relationships and previous experience with other modalities.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursesPatient Education as TopicPerceptionRenal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyAdultCanadaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchin‐centre haemodialysiskidney replacement therapymodality educationnursesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39865379
PMCPMC11771708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.