ArticleDental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology2025
Evaluation of Chatbots in the Emergency Management of Avulsion Injuries.
Article in Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Are mobile health applications for traumatic dental injuries effective? A systematic review of their impact on diagnosis, prevention, management, and education.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating ChatGPT-4o as an Educational Support Tool for the Emergency Management of Dental Trauma: Randomized Controlled Study Among Students.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Comparative Benchmark of Seven Large Language Models for Traumatic Dental Injury Knowledge.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluating Guideline Adherence in Gemini-Powered Dental Trauma Workflows: Standalone Gemini Chat vs. Document-Grounded NotebookLM.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026Article
- New Frontiers in Dental Traumatology: Innovation, Prevention, and Clinical Practice.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of large language models in root resorption scenarios: an ESE-aligned comparative performance assessment.Odontology · 2026Article
- Impact of guideline-based prompting on the large language model performance in dental trauma management clinical decision-making.Odontology · 2026Article
- Performance Comparison of a Domain-Specific Chatbot and General-Purpose Chatbots in Dental Traumatology.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Large Language Model-Based Chatbots for Dental Trauma Management: A Comparative Study Based on Accuracy, Consistency and Information Quality.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Quality, completeness, readability, and response time of AI chatbots in the management of deep caries and pulp exposure: a bilingual comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Can AI chatbots be reliable in dental emergencies? quality assessment of Arabic responses to dental emergency inquiries and public attitudes toward their use.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Can artificial intelligence applications be utilised in the management of dental trauma? A comparison of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- AI-based diagnostic evaluation of GPT-4o for crown-fracture detection on maxillary periapical radiographs: effects of prompt detail and customization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Are chatbots reliable sources of information regarding fluoride in pediatric dentistry?BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Paediatric Dentistry: A Scoping Review.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of large language models for patient-oriented support in dental trauma emergencies.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of language difference and time on the accuracy of artificial intelligence chatbots responses to questions about vital pulp therapy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparison of chatbots' accuracy in endodontics questions in dentistry specialization exam in Türkiye: ChatGPT-4o, Gemini Advanced, Copilot, and Claude.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Based Chatbots in Providing First Aid Information on Dental Trauma According to the ToothSOS Application.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence model for application in dental traumatology.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the accuracy and consistency of responses provided by six Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI), Perplexity (Perplexity.AI), Gemini (Google), and Copilot (Bing), to questions related to emergency management of avulsed teeth. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo pediatric dentists developed 18 true or false questions regarding dental avulsion and asked public chatbots for 3 days. The responses were recorded and compared with the correct answers. The SPSS program was used to calculate the obtained accuracies and their consistency.
resultsChatGPT 4.0 achieved the highest accuracy rate of 95.6% over the entire time frame, while Perplexity (Perplexity.AI) had the lowest accuracy rate of 67.2%. ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI) was the only AI that achieved perfect agreement with real answers, except at noon on day 1. ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) was the AI that showed the weakest agreement (6 times).
conclusionsWith the exception of ChatGPT's paid version, 4.0, AI chatbots do not seem ready for use as the main resource in managing avulsed teeth during emergencies. It might prove beneficial to incorporate the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines in chatbot databases, enhancing their accuracy and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.