ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025
The Effect of Plaque Detectors on the Color Stability of Two Types of Restorative Materials.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of plaque disclosing agents on the color stability of different restorative materials: in vitro study.European oral research · 2026Article
- Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the color stability of a one-shade resin-based composite material (RC) and a glass-ionomer cement (GIC) after staining with plaque detectors (PDs) with different formulations and delivery forms. MATERIALS AND
methodsRectangular-shaped specimens (7 × 3 × 2 mm) were produced with RC (Venus Diamond One, Kulzer) and GIC (Fujy IX GP, GC) (n = 30). Further, the following PDs were used on the specimens: (1) tablets (T; Plaq-Search, TePe); (2) mouthwash (M; Plaque Agent, Miradent); and (3) light-curing liquid (L; Plaque test, Ivoclar). The PDs were removed with dedicated toothbrushes (T
resultsThe type of PD, the polishing procedure and their interactions influenced the color stability of both restorative materials (p < 0.05). Particularly, after the second PDs application, M and L produced the highest color changes (p < 0.05), with GIC showing higher color variability than RC. Although repolishing reduced the color changes of RC (p < 0.05), it could not reestablish the initial color of GIC, irrespective of the PD used (p < 0.05). Except for RC associated with T, all materials exhibited discoloration above the clinical perceptibility (1.77) and acceptability (2.66) thresholds.
conclusionsThe influence of PDs on the color stability of RC and GIC was material-dependent. GIC showed higher color instability than RC. Repolishing could not reestablish the original color of GIC and only attenuated the color changes of the one-shade RC. The newly introduced digital colorimeter was an important tool to standardize and simplify color measurement evaluations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PDs can pose a potential risk to the color stability of restorative materials. Dental practitioners should be careful when recommending the frequency of at-home application of PDs, taking into consideration the material properties and the position of the restorations of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.