Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865301›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2025

Cardio-renal effect of dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin- saxagliptin combination on CD34 + ve hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and podocyte specific markers in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) subjects: a randomized trial.

Seshagiri Rao Nandula, Arad Jain, Sabyasachi Sen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT03660683. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03660683 phase4terminated

Cardio-Protective of Effect of Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin Combination on Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Ran2018Enrolled15Registered outcomes14Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsDapagliflozin 10mg, Placebo Oral Tablet, Saxagliptin 5mg
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seshagiri Rao NandulaDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Arad JainDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Sabyasachi SenDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. ssen1@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-9129

Funding

AstraZeneca United States AstraZeneca United States
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffects of Dapagliflozin (Dapa) and Dapagliflozin-Saxagliptin combination (Combo) was examined on peripheral blood derived CD34 + Hematopoetic Stem Cells (HSCs) as a cellular CVD biomarker. Both Dapa (a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 or SGLT2, receptor inhibitor) and Saxagliptin (a Di-peptydl-peptidase-4 or DPP4 enzyme inhibitor) are commonly used type 2 diabetes mellitus or T2DM medications, however the benefit of using the combination has not been evaluated for cardio-renal risk assessment, in a real-life practice setting, compared to a placebo. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that Dapa will improve the outcomes when compared to placebo and the Combo maybe even more beneficial.

methodsThis is a pilot study evaluating low dose Dapagliflozin 10 mg or low dose Dapa + low dose Saxagliptin combination. 15 subjects were enrolled in 16 weeks, double-blind, three-arm, randomized placebo matched trial, with 10mg Dapa + Saxa placebo (n = 4), 10 mg Dapa + 5 mg Saxa (n = 5) Combo, And Dapa placebo + Saxa placebo (n = 6), Placebo groups. T2DM subjects (age 30-70 yrs) with HbA1c of 7-10%, were included. CD34 + HSC number, migration, mRNA expression along with biochemistry and urine exosomes were measured. Data were collected at week 0, 8, and 16. For statistics, a mixed model regression analysis was used.

resultsSignificant HbA1c (p = 0.0357) reduction was noted in Combo group versus Dapa alone and Placebo. hsCRP levels (P = 0.0317) and IL-6, two important inflammatory molecules, were significantly reduced in both Dapa and Combo vs. Placebo. Leptin levels decreased significantly in both Dapa alone (p = 0.035) and Combo group(p = 0.015), vs. Placebo, however the Adiponectin levels were higher in Dapa alone group. Dapagliflozin alone reduced lipid parameters significantly particularly triglyceride (TG) when compared to placebo, with resultant visit 3 values at 99.5 ± 7.2 vs. 129 ± 12.3 and LDL/HDL ratio values were similar at 2.18 ± 0.08 vs. 2.13 ± 0.15. CD34 + cell migration improved significantly in both Dapa alone (p = 0.05) and Combo group (p = 0.05) vs. Placebo.

conclusionsSeveral parameters showed significant improvement with both Dapa alone and Combo compared to placebo. However, when all outcome measures were taken into account, other than glycemic control the Combo didn't seem to offer any further benefit, over Dapa alone. Therefore, contrary to our initial hypothesis we do not believe the more expensive Dapa + Saxa combination offers any specific cardiovascular benefit compared to Dapagliflozin alone. However it is noteworthy that both Dapa and its combination with Saxagliptin showed significant improvement compared to placebo in T2DM, particularly when progenitor cell based numbers and function were analyzed and taken into account.

trial registrationThe trial was registered with Clinical Trials.gov number NCT03660683, last updated 06052023.

Indexed as

AdamantaneBenzhydryl CompoundsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DipeptidesGlucosidesHematopoietic Stem CellsAdultAgedAntigens, CD34BiomarkersDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdamantaneAntigens, CD34Benzhydryl CompoundsBiomarkersdapagliflozinDipeptidesDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucosidessaxagliptin

Identifiers

PMID39865301
PMCPMC11770927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.