Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865247›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery.

Irina Palimaru Manhoobi, Julia Ellbrant, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Søren Redsted, Anne Bodilsen, Trine Tramm, Peer Christiansen, Lisa Rydén

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Irina Palimaru ManhoobiDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Irina.Palimaru.Manhoobi@rsyd.dk.
Julia EllbrantDepartment of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pär-Ola BendahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Søren RedstedDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne BodilsenDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Trine TrammDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peer ChristiansenDepartment of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPositive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) most often demands a repeat surgery. To preoperatively identify patients at risk of positive margins, a multivariable model has been developed that predicts positive margins after BCS with a high accuracy. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction model to explore its generalizability and assess if additional preoperatively available variables can further improve its predictive accuracy. The validation cohort included 225 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark during 2020-2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration analysis were used to validate the prediction model. Univariable logistic regression was used to evaluate if additional variables available in the validation cohort were associated with positive margins and backward elimination to explore if these variables could further improve the model´s predictive accuracy.

resultsThe AUC of the model was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.50-0.70) indicating a lower discriminative capacity in the external cohort. We found weak evidence for an association between increased preoperative breast density on mammography and positive resection margins after BCS (p = 0.027), but the AUC of the model did not improve, when mammographic breast density was included as an additional variable in the model.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedBreast DensityDenmarkFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedROC CurveBreast-conserving surgeryExternal validationInvasive breast cancerPositive resection marginsPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39865247
PMCPMC11770974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.