ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on noise-induced hearing loss based on functional and structural MRI using machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The incidence and risk factors of perioperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture under the Unaccompanied- Care model.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Observational
- Unsupervised Transformer Learning for Rapid and High-Quality MRI Data Acquisition.Health data science · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common occupational condition. The aim of this study was to develop a classification model for NIHL on the basis of both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) by applying machine learning methods. fMRI indices such as the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), degree of centrality (DC), and sMRI indices such as gray matter volume (GMV), white matter volume (WMV), and cortical thickness were extracted from each brain region. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to reduce and select the optimal features. The support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) algorithms, were used to establish the classification model for NIHL. Finally, the SVM model based on combined fMRI indices, achieved the best performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 and an accuracy of 95%. The SVM classification model that integrates fMRI indicators has the greatest potential for identifying NIHL patients and healthy people, revealing the complementary role of fMRI indicators in classification and indicating that it is necessary to include multiple indicators of the brain when establishing a classification model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.