ArticleScientific reports2025
Global, regional, and national burden of esophageal cancer using the 2019 global burden of disease study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global incidence of esophageal cancer by histological and anatomical subtypes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Hyperspectral reconstruction of white light endoscopy images for enhanced segmentation of early esophageal lesions in patients.iScience · 2026Article
- MRI outperforms CT for tracheal and vascular invasion staging in esophageal cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- tRF-29-86J8WPMN1EJ3: a tRNA-derived small RNA promoting esophageal cancer progression.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for disease recurrence after endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Optimization and characterization of acute radiation-induced esophagitis in mice.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Co-occurrence patterns of esophageal and stomach cancer across 204 countries and territories: a spatial correspondence and systematic analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Preoperative prognostic nutritional index as a predictive factor for postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer, with its aggressive nature and high mortality, poses diverse epidemiological challenges worldwide. Over the past three decades, esophageal cancer has exhibited a substantial global burden, marked by a significant increase in absolute numbers, contrasting with a decline in age-standardized metrics. Prevalence nearly doubled, reaching 0.961 million in 2019, while the age-standardized rate (ASR) decreased to 11.6 per 100,000 cases. New incidence cases surged by 67.07%, yet the age-standardized incidence rate reduced to 6.5 per 100,000 cases. Deaths increased to 0.498 million, with a decline in age-standardized mortality to 6.1 per 100,000 cases. Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) rose to 11.67 million, but the ASR decreased to 139.8 per 100,000 cases. Gender-specific analysis revealed consistently higher rates in males, with increasing gaps over time. Correlations with SDI indicated a negative association, and frontier analysis underscored the impact of socio-economic progress on disease control. Projections suggest a continued rise in prevalence, incidence, deaths, and DALYs, with gender-specific variations. The research underscores the importance of continued efforts in public health and medical research to adapt to and manage the changing landscape of esophageal cancer globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.