Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865145›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Herb-disease association prediction model based on network consistency projection.

Lei Chen, Shiyi Zhang, Bo Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China. lchen@shmtu.edu.cn.
Shiyi ZhangCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China.
Bo ZhouSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of biological and clinical reports indicate the usefulness of herbs in the treatment of complex human diseases, giving an essential supplement for modern medicine. Similar to drugs, the use of experimental validation to identify related diseases of given herbs is both expensive and time-consuming. Such validation is even more difficult because each herb always contains several components. It is alternative to design computational models to predict herb-disease associations (HDAs). Nevertheless, only a few computational models have been developed for HDA prediction. In this study, we make full use of several properties of herbs and diseases, which are collected in a public database HERB, to design a model named HDAPM-NCP for predicting HDAs. Based on these properties, six herb kernels and five disease kernels are constructed, which are further fused into one unified herb kernel and one disease kernel. These kernels and herb-disease adjacency matrix are fed into network consistency projection to quantify the strength of herb-disease pairs. The cross-validation results show the high performance of HDAPM-NCP. Such performance is higher than that of two previous models. The ablation experiments prove the effects of modules in this model. Finally, we also analyze the weakness and strength of the model, uncovering which herb-disease pairs that HDAPM-NCP can yield reliable or unsatisfied predictions, and a case study is conducted to prove that HDAPM-NCP can discover latent HDAs.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyPlants, MedicinalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansDiseaseHerbHerb-disease associationNetwork consistency projection

Identifiers

PMID39865145
PMCPMC11770172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.