ArticleScientific reports2025
A cross-sectional study on the association between physical activity and the risk of colon cancer based on NHANES 2007-2018.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary inflammatory index and the risk of colorectal adenomas and cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Nutrition journal · 2025Pooled it
- NMolecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Watch and wait in locally advanced rectal cancer: Evolution, current evidence, and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- The role of physical activity and epigenetic changes in colorectal cancer prevention.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colon cancer poses a significant threat to global health, and studies have shown a correlation between physical activity (PA) and the incidence of colon cancer. However, existing research has not quantitatively analyzed PA to evaluate its impact on the risk of colon cancer comprehensively. Data related to the study were obtained from the NHANES database for participants aged 20 and above between 2007 and 2018. Calculate the daily total metabolic equivalent (MET) based on the duration of different physical activities for each participant, use multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between PA and colon cancer risk, perform subgroup analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between different subgroups, and use RCS regression analysis to evaluate the non-linear relationship between MET and colon cancer risk. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with the overall data of the participants in this study, the OR of the low PA group (PA ≤ 120MET/day) was 1.224 (95% CI 1.031-1.453, P = 0.023), the OR of the mild PA group (120 < PA ≤ 600MET/day) was 1.026 (95%CI 0.707-1.488, P = 0.894), the OR of the moderate intensity PA group (600 < PA ≤ 1200MET/day) was 0.798 (95% CI 0.506-1.258, P = 0.334), and the OR of the high-intensity PA group (PA > 1200MET/day) was 0.470 (95% CI 0.249-0.885, P = 0.022), these results are consistent in subgroup analysis. The RCS regression analysis results showed a significant nonlinear relationship between MET and the risk of colon cancer(p < 0.001), with an inflection point observed at 1879 MET/day on the correlation curve. Low physical activity increases the risk of colon cancer, while moderate to high-intensity physical activity can reduce the risk of colon cancer. The results of this study emphasize the importance of maintaining appropriate physical activity as a healthy way to prevent colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.