ArticleScientific reports2025
Distinct relative abundances in pathogens detected in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia in the intensive care unit at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation on the Lung Microbiome.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Serum valeric acid stimulates lung epithelial cilia assembly and improves prognosis in patients with severe respiratory infections.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we present for the first time the landscape of the lung microbiota in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia. DNA from 83 deep endotracheal aspirate lung samples was subjected to PacBio sequencing to identify pathogens in comparison with conventional diagnostic techniques. Patients on ventilation with pneumonia presented with similar lung flora to those of patients on ventilation without pneumonia. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were detected in the majority of the samples. Samples treated with different antibiotics exhibited similar abundances of phyla and families. In order, the ten most common species detected in 16 clusters were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Metamycoplasma salivarium, Elizabethkingia anophilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Prevotella oris and Klebsiella africana. Of 51 on ventilation with pneumonia, the pathogens identified through sequencing corresponded with the findings from culture-dependent tests in 26 patients (50.98%), whereas the results differed in 30 patients (58.82%). Of 32 patients on ventilation without pneumonia, the pathogens identified through sequencing matched the conventional diagnostics results in only two patients (6.25%) but differed in 25 patients (78.13%). In summary, patients on mechanical ventilation with pneumonia did not display notable phenotypic traits. K. pneumoniae and S. maltophilia were the most common taxa detected in the samples, although some variations in microbial composition were observed. We conclude that Intensive Care Units exhibit distinct patterns of microbial colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.