Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Varying effects of Vicia sativa and Vicia villosa on bacterial composition and enzyme activities in nutrient-deficient sugarcane soils under greenhouse conditions.

Emihle Ngonini, María A Pérez-Fernández, Anathi Magadlela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emihle NgoniniSchool of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal (Westville Campus), Private Bag X 54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
María A Pérez-FernándezDepartment of Physical, Chemical and Natural Systems, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Carretera de Utrera Km 1, Seville, 41013, Spain.
Anathi MagadlelaSchool of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal (Westville Campus), Private Bag X 54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa. anathimagadlela@icloud.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declining soil health and productivity are key challenges faced by sugarcane small-scale growers in South Africa. Incorporating Vicia sativa and Vicia villosa as cover crops can improve soil health by enhancing nutrient-cycling enzyme activities and nitrogen (N) contributions while promoting the presence of beneficial bacteria in the rhizosphere. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the chemical and biological inputs of V. sativa and V. villosa in nutrient-deficient, KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) sugarcane plantation soils. The nutrient concentrations, N and phosphorus (P) cycling bacteria, and extracellular enzyme activities of 5 soils were determined pre-planting and post-V. sativa and V. villosa harvest. Post-harvesting soils had higher pH levels than pre-planting soils. The number of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increased post-V. sativa and V. villosa harvest, with Arthrobacter, Burkholderia, Paraburkholderia and Pseudomonas as the dominant genera. Acid phosphatase and glucosidase activities increased, with Mvutshini and Mzinto showing the most significant increases (phosphatase: 18.66 to 84.67 for V. villosa, 90.33 for V. sativa; glucosidase: 15.33 to 83 for V. villosa and 105 µmolh

Indexed as

BacteriaSaccharumSoilSoil MicrobiologyNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusRhizosphereNitrogenNutrientsPhosphorusSoilPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteriaSmall-scale sugarcane plantationsSoil pHVicia sativaVicia villosa

Identifiers

PMID39865122
PMCPMC11770188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.