Observational studyScientific reports2025
Effect of external infusion connection devices replacement frequency on catheter related bloodstream infection.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timely and effective rescue of critically ill children no longer solely relies on advanced medical technology; vascular access plays a pivotal role. Best practice recommendations for nursing in vascular access are critical for ICU patients. However, clear guidelines for the maintenance of external infusion connection devices remain lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study to examine the relationship between the number or replacement frequency of external infusion connection devices and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). From September 2021 to December 2022, a total of 304 patients with a single non-tunneled central catheter were enrolled in our study. Our findings revealed no significant differences in CRBSI incidence based on the number or replacement frequency of external infusion connection devices during the catheter's indwelling time (P > 0.05). Notably, coagulase-negative staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, were the predominant pathogens in CRBSI cases.In real-world clinical settings, adherence to strict aseptic principles during infusion set use and replacement appeared to mitigate the correlation between device replacement frequency or number and CRBSI incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.