ArticleScientific reports2025
Sensitivity of coronary hemodynamics to vascular structure variations in health and disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Microvascular Resistance on Coronary Hemodynamic Diagnostic Indices: A Multiscale Simulation Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Design Rules for Robust Coronary Artery Segmentation: A Systematic Analysis of Dataset Size, Windowing, Architectures, and Vessel Geometry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- An Automated Modular Platform for Vascular Graft Assessment via Coronary-like Flow-Induced Stimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local hemodynamics play an essential role in the initiation and progression of coronary artery disease. While vascular geometry alters local hemodynamics, the relationship between vascular structure and hemodynamics is poorly understood. Previous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have explored how anatomy influences plaque-promoting hemodynamics. For example, areas exposed to low wall shear stress (ALWSS) can indicate regions of plaque growth. However, small sample sizes, idealized geometries, and simplified boundary conditions have limited their scope. We generated 230 synthetic models of left coronary arteries and simulated coronary hemodynamics with physiologically realistic boundary conditions. We measured the sensitivity of hemodynamic metrics to changes in bifurcation angles, positions, diameter ratios, tortuosity, and plaque topology. Our results suggest that the diameter ratio between left coronary branches plays a substantial role in generating adverse hemodynamic phenotypes and can amplify the effect of other geometric features such as bifurcation position and angle, and vessel tortuosity. Introducing mild plaque in the models did not change correlations between structure and hemodynamics. However, certain vascular structures can induce ALWSS at the trailing edge of the plaque. Our analysis demonstrates that coronary artery vascular structure can provide key insight into the hemodynamic environments conducive to plaque formation and growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.