Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Flood change detection model based on an improved U-net network and multi-head attention mechanism.

Fajing Wang, Xu Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fajing WangSchool of Transportation and Geometics Engineering, Yangling Vocational & Technical College, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Xu FengSchool of Transportation and Geometics Engineering, Yangling Vocational & Technical College, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. 18811360968@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of flood disaster monitoring, including monitoring before, during, and after the flood, to achieve accurate extraction of flood disaster change information. A modified U-Net network model, incorporating the Transformer multi-head attention mechanism (TM), is developed specifically for the characteristics of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. By integrating the TM, the model effectively prioritizes image regions relevant to flood disasters. The model is trained on a substantial volume of annotated SAR image data, and its performance is assessed using metrics such as loss function, accuracy, and precision. Experimental findings demonstrate significant improvements in loss value, accuracy, and precision compared to existing models. Specifically, the accuracy of the model algorithm in this work reaches 95.52%, marking a 3.46% improvement over the baseline U-Net network. Additionally, the developed model achieves an accuracy of 90.11% while maintaining a loss value of approximately 0.59, whereas other model algorithms exceed a loss value of 0.74. Thus, this work not only introduces a novel technical approach for flood disaster monitoring but also has the potential to enhance disaster response procedures and provide scientific evidence for disaster management and risk assessment processes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAttention mechanismFlood disaster identificationSAR imageryU-Net network

Identifiers

PMID39865097
PMCPMC11770074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.