Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39865086›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Disorder-induced enhancement of lithium-ion transport in solid-state electrolytes.

Zhimin Chen, Tao Du, N M Anoop Krishnan, Yuanzheng Yue, Morten M Smedskjaer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Atomistic Kinetics of Dislocation-Mediated Grain Growth in Monolayer MoSAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Chemical heterogeneity for battery materials.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. An Atomistic Study of Reactivity in Solid-State Electrolyte Interphase Formation for Li/LiThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhimin ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Tao DuDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark. tao.du@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-6320
N M Anoop KrishnanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1500-4947
Yuanzheng YueDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-5236
Morten M SmedskjaerDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark. mos@bio.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-2021

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 202106880010National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52108259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the ion conduction in solid electrolytes is critically important for the development of high-performance all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Lithium thiophosphates are among the most promising solid electrolytes, as they exhibit superionic conductivity at room temperature. However, the lack of comprehensive understanding of their ion conduction mechanism, especially the effect of structural disorder on ionic conductivity, is a long-standing problem that limits further innovations in all-solid-state LIBs. Here, we address this challenge by establishing and employing a deep learning potential to simulate Li

Identifiers

PMID39865086
PMCPMC11770192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.