Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39864837›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025

Randomized Clinical Trial of Extending the Time Window of Endovascular Therapy in the Triage of Late Presenting Stroke Beyond 24 h (SKIP-EXTEND): Rationale and Study Protocol.

Kentaro Suzuki, Yuji Matsumaru, Masataka Takeuchi, Masafumi Morimoto, Junya Kaneko, Keigo Shigeta, Tomoji Takigawa, Takehiro Katano, Junya Aoki, Mikito Hayakawa and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kentaro SuzukiDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School.
Yuji MatsumaruDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Masataka TakeuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seisho Hospital.
Masafumi MorimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yokohama Shintoshi Neurosurgical Hospital.
Junya KanekoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital.
Keigo ShigetaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center.
Tomoji TakigawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center.
Takehiro KatanoDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School.
Junya AokiDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School.
Mikito HayakawaDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba.
Toshiaki OtsukaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School.
Shigeru FujimotoDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Kazumi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Nippon Medical School.
SKIP-EXTEND Trial Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic time window for endovascular therapy in acute stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion was extended to 24 hours from onset. Although a retrospective study showed the efficacy of endovascular therapy beyond 24 hours from the last known well, it remains unclear whether endovascular therapy is effective. Extending the time window of Endovascular therapy in the Triage of Late Presenting Strokes beyond 24 h (SKIP-EXTEND trial) aimed to clarify the efficacy of endovascular therapy compared to the best medical management. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point clinical trial. Eligibility criteria included adults and pre-stroke modified Rankin scale score ≤2 with internal carotid artery or M1 (horizontal or sphenoidal segment) occlusion beyond 24 to 72 hours of the last known well. The target enrollment is 260 patients, with 130 reeiving endovascular therapy and 130 receiving the best medical treatment. The primary outcome is the rate of favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin scale score ≤2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes are the ordinal logistic regression analysis of the modified Rankin scale score and the rate of recanalization at 48 hours. As safety outcomes, the rate of any and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours and the rate of mortality at 90 days are assessed. This is the first randomized controlled trial to focus on the efficacy of endovascular therapy beyond 24 hours. Our results will not only benefit patients but also reduce healthcare costs. We believe that this novel study will be useful in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeTime-to-TreatmentTriageFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment Outcome24 hoursendovascular therapyrandomized clinical trialstroke

Identifiers

PMID39864837
PMCPMC11968198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.