Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39864817›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Insights From Diverse Perspectives on Social Media Messages to Inform Young Adults With Cancer About Clinical Trials: Focus Group Study.

Melissa P Beauchemin, Desiree Walker, Allison Rosen, Maria Frazer, Meital Eisenberger, Rhea K Khurana, Edward Bentlyewski, Victoria Fedorko, Corey H Basch, Grace C Hillyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melissa P BeaucheminColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-1586
Desiree WalkerAfiya, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-4275-7252
Allison RosenAdvocates for Collaborative Education, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9429-4788
Maria FrazerPediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-3051-8111
Meital EisenbergerCancer Clinical Protocol and Data Management, Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-3560-7764
Rhea K KhuranaColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-5464-5548
Edward BentlyewskiCancer Clinical Protocol and Data Management, Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-1940-2942
Victoria FedorkoDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-0563-4023
Corey H BaschDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-4229
Grace C HillyerDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-075X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low rates of adolescent and young adult (YA; aged 15-39 y) clinical trial enrollment (CTE), particularly among underserved groups, have resulted in a lack of standardized cancer treatments and follow-up guidelines for this group that may limit improvement in cancer treatments and survival outcomes for YAs. Objective: To understand and address unique barriers to CTE, we conducted focus groups to learn about informational, financial, and psychosocial needs of YAs surrounding CTE and identify strategies to address these barriers. Methods: We conducted 5 focus groups in 2023 among a diverse sample of YA patients from across the United States. An interview guide was developed collaboratively with YA advocates. Specifically, informational needs, financial concerns, and psychosocial issues were explored, and participants were probed to suggest strategies, especially those that leverage technology, to address these barriers. Sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using direct content analysis. Findings were synthesized through consensus discussions. Results: We confirmed the previously proposed thematic barriers regarding YA CTE and identified 9 subthemes: awareness, lack of clear and accessible CTE information, fear of the unknown, assumptions about costs, insurance coverage, navigating financial responsibilities, clinical trial discussions, clinical trial misconceptions, and desire for a support network. Throughout, YAs mentioned needs that might be addressed through informational outreach leveraging digital technology, the internet, and social media. Conclusions: This study expands knowledge of YA perceived barriers to CTE. These findings suggest that leveraging digital technology to disseminate reliable information to address needs may be an effective strategy to improve clinical trial participation in the YA population.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicNeoplasmsSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatient SelectionQualitative ResearchUnited StatesYoung Adultadolescent and young adult cancercancercancer treatmentclinical trial attitudesclinical trial awarenessclinical trial enrollmentclinical trial enrollment barriersclinical trial knowledgeclinical trialspsychosocialsocial mediasocial media messagesUnited Statesyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39864817
PMCPMC11769686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.