ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2025
Quantifying knee-adjacent subcutaneous fat in the entire OAI baseline dataset - Associations with cartilage MRI T
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current state of research and future developments of artificial intelligence in pain diagnosis and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- AI for Opportunistic Identification of BMD and Bone Microarchitecture: A Narrative Review.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Increase in knee-adjacent subcutaneous fat is associated with cartilage degeneration independent of BMI: A four-year analysis of the OAI dataset.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for clinical and structural knee osteoarthritis prediction: Recent advancements and future directions.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveKnee-adjacent subcutaneous fat (kaSCF) has emerged as a potential biomarker and risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) progression. This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence-based tool for the automatic segmentation of kaSCF thickness and evaluate the cross-sectional associations between kaSCF, cartilage thickness, magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage T
designBaseline 3.0T MR images of the right knee from the entire Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort (n=4796) were used to quantify average values of kaSCF, cartilage thickness, and T
resultsModel prediction CVs for kaSCF thickness ranged from 3.57% to 9.87% across femoral and tibial regions. Greater average kaSCF was associated with thinner cartilage in men (std. β= -0.029, 95% CI: -0.050 to -0.007, p=0.010) and higher T
conclusionsGreater kaSCF was associated with thinner cartilage in men, higher T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.