SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Knowledge and attitude of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication barriers make it difficult for deaf women to access information about contraceptive methods, making them vulnerable to unplanned pregnancies.
objectiveTo identify knowledge and attitudes of deaf women in relation to contraceptive methods.
methodThe authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, PROSPERO registry (CRD42021277635), conducted from August 2021 to April 2024. The included studies focused on knowledge and attitudes about contraception among women with deafness.
resultsTwelve articles were included, with a total of 2,641 participants and those reported low knowledge about contraceptive methods. Nine studies showed withdrawal, condoms, and oral contraceptives as the best methods that deaf women know. Five studies showed low knowledge about intrauterine devices and subdermal implants. The main reasons given for abandoning the method were reproductive desire and fear of side effects. The use of hormonal contraceptives was higher among adult women and, two studies showed that among teenagers the practice of withdrawal was higher than the use of condoms. The barriers most mentioned in the eight articles for the use of contraceptives were those of communication.
conclusionKnowledge of contraceptives among deaf women was low; however, the attitude of acceptance of the use of contraceptive methods was favorable, despite the little access to more effective methods, especially among adolescents. The factor associated with low knowledge evidenced in the systematic review was communication barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.