Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39864242›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2025

AI-based methods for biomolecular structure modeling for Cryo-EM.

Farhanaz Farheen, Genki Terashi, Han Zhu, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Accurate Macromolecular Complex Modeling for Cryo-EM with CryoZeta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. New York City's structural biology mosaic.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farhanaz FarheenDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Genki TerashiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Han ZhuDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: dkihara@purdue.edu.

Funding

Building protein structure models for intermediate resolution cryo-electron microscopy mapsR01GM133840 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM133840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) has revolutionized structural biology by enabling the determination of macromolecular structures that were challenging to study with conventional methods. Processing cryo-EM data involves several computational steps to derive three-dimensional structures from raw projections. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) including deep learning have significantly improved the performance of these processes. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art AI-based techniques used in key steps of cryo-EM data processing, including macromolecular structure modeling and heterogeneity analysis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCryoelectron MicroscopyMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularDeep LearningMacromolecular SubstancesAIArtificial intelligenceCryo-EMDeep learningStructural heterogeneityStructure modelingStructure validation

Identifiers

PMID39864242
PMCPMC11793015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.