ArticleJMIR cardio2025
A Medication Management App (Smart-Meds) for Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Pilot Pre-Post Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medication nonadherence remains a significant challenge in the management of chronic conditions, often leading to suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased health care costs. Innovative interventions that address the underlying factors contributing to nonadherence are needed. Gamified mobile apps have shown promise in promoting behavior change and engagement. Objective: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and usability of a gamified mobile app that used a narrative storytelling approach to enhance medication adherence among patients following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The study aimed to assess changes in participants' beliefs about medication and self-reported adherence before and after the intervention. Additionally, user feedback regarding the narrative component of the app was gathered. Methods: Overall, 18 patients who recently experienced ACS were recruited for a 1-month intervention using the gamified app. Participants' beliefs about medication and self-reported adherence were assessed using standardized scales pre- and postintervention. The app's usability was also evaluated through a postintervention questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the significance of changes in belief and adherence scores. Results: Although 33% (6/18) of the participants did not use the intervention more than once, the remaining 12 remained engaged during the 30 days of the study. The results did not indicate a significant improvement in participants' beliefs about medication following the intervention. However, self-reported adherence significantly improved (P<.05) after the intervention with a mean score going from 29.1 (SD 6.9) to 32.4 (SD 5.6), with participants demonstrating a greater self-efficacy to their prescribed medication regimen. However, the results did not indicate a significant improvement in participants' beliefs about medication. With a mean average score of 80.6, the usability evaluation indicates a good usability rating for the gamified app. However, the narrative storytelling component of the app was not favored by the participants, as indicated by their feedback. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that a gamified mobile app using narration may effectively enhance medication self-efficacy and positively influence patients' beliefs about medication following ACS. However, the narrative component of the app did not receive favorable feedback from participants. Future research should focus on exploring alternative methods to engage participants in the app's narrative elements while maintaining the positive impact on adherence and beliefs about medication observed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.