Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39864077›Full record

SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2025

Is efficacy of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in mid to late adolescents and young adults related to craniofacial sutures opening? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Lázaro-Abdulkarim, F Hernández-Alfaro, A Puigdollers-Pérez, M Giralt-Hernando, B Elnayef, A Valls-Ontañón

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Lázaro-AbdulkarimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery International University of Catalonia Josep Trueta s/n, Sant Cugat del Vallès CP 08195, Barcelona, Spain a.lazaro@uic.es.
F Hernández-Alfaro
A Puigdollers-Pérez
M Giralt-Hernando
B Elnayef
A Valls-Ontañón

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransverse maxillary deficiency is a relatively common type of malocclusion, that if left untreated will probably affect the permanent dentition. Recent investigations have proposed the use of bone-supported miniscrews around the midpalatal suture to expand the palate in late adolescents. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of the Miniscrew Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) technique in young adult patients, by quantifying skeletal expansion in relation to the age of the patient, as well as the impact upon other craniofacial sutures, and to describe the possible dental side effects. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn electronic and manual search was conducted, in which 17 were included in the study.

resultsThe estimated mean palatal opening width and nasal cavity width was 2.99 ± 0.33 mm and 2.24 ± 0.17 mm, respectively. A significant association was observed between midpalatal and pterygoid suture opening (p=0.010). No association was found between age and the MARPE technique (p=0.701).

conclusionsThe results of this study show that the MARPE technique produces significant opening width in young adults at both at midpalatal suture and nasal cavity level, and apparently only significantly widens the pterygoid suture. Greater dental side effects are directly associated to a reduced midpalatal suture opening width.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsCranial SuturesPalatal Expansion TechniqueAdolescentHumansTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39864077
PMCPMC11972644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.