ArticleEndocrine2025
Pros and cons of surgical versus conservative management for head and neck paraganglioma: a real-world data analysis.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current evidence and future perspectives in the treatment of head and neck vagal paragangliomas: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare functional deficits associated to surgery with those caused by the growth of the head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs).
methods72 patients with HNPGLs were included. Patients were divided in group A (49 patients undergoing surgery) and group B (23 patients following a wait and see approach). Each patient was subjected to clinical evaluation and genetic testing. The presence of functional neurological deficits in speech or swallowing and quality of life were assessed via a dedicated otolaryngologist visit, three posted questionnaires (VHI, DHI, and MDADI), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35.
resultsThirty-four patients from group A (69.4%) and 18 from group B (78.2%) agreed to fill out the posted questionnaires. Eighteen patients from group A (36.7%) and 10 from group B (43.5%) underwent a dedicated otolaryngologist visit. A significant difference between group A and B was observed in the VHI (p = 0.001) and DHI scoring (p = 0.020), and at the otolaryngologist visit (mild neurological disabilities, p = 0.007). Patients with familial forms presented multiple HNPGLs (p = 0.011), multiple secreting lesions (p = 0.010) and underwent surgery more times for HNPGLs (p = 0.009) and for both HNPGLs and sympathetic PGLs (p = 0.015). ROC curve analysis suggests that surgery in carotid body tumors >34 mm may be more frequently associated with nerve injury.
conclusionThe management of HNPGL patients remains challenging for clinicians. This preliminary study seems to suggest that surgery still represents the first choice for patients with small lesions. An accurate clinical evaluation is mandatory to avoid non-resolving surgery and possible neurovascular long-term complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.