ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
How low should we go? Outcomes of ECMO in neonates with low gestational age or birth weight.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInitial recommendations for ECMO had relative contraindications for low birth weight (BW) or low gestational age (GA) babies. However, more recent literature has demonstrated improved and acceptable outcomes of ECMO in smaller neonates. The purpose of this study was to understand both utilization and survival in patients with lower GA and BW.
methodsAll neonates captured in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry who underwent a single ECMO run from 2009 to 2019 were included. The primary outcome measure was mortality and the secondary outcome measure was major adverse outcomes, defined as a composite outcome variable any severe ECMO complications. Univariate and multivariable statistical tests were performed to estimate the association between GA and BW with both outcome variables.
resultsA total of 14,167 cases met inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis noted that birth weight, gestational age, ECMO mode, pulmonary support type, pH and ventilator settings were highly significant predictors of survival. Multivariable assessment noted significant linear relationship of mortality rates with increasing GA and BW (p < 0.001, OR = 0.82 GA, 0.51 BW). The highest ECMO-related mortality was observed in neonates with GA 30-31 weeks and BW 1.5-2.0 kg, with a 70-75% in-hospital mortality rate.
conclusionsDecreasing GA and BW were strongly correlated with increasing odds of mortality and/or ECMO-related complications. However, even in low GA or BW neonates, survival may be possible in up to a quarter of patients put on ECMO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39864029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.