ArticleBiophysical journal2025
How SNARE proteins generate force to fuse membranes.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using multiscale molecular dynamics simulations to explore the fusion machinery underlying neurotransmitter release.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2025Review
- Membrane fusion and budding.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Beyond Static Tethering at Membrane Contact Sites: Structural Dynamics and Functional Implications of VAP Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane fusion is central to fundamental cellular processes such as exocytosis, when an intracellular machinery fuses membrane-enclosed vesicles to the plasma membrane for content release. The core machinery components are the SNARE proteins. SNARE complexation pulls the membranes together, but the fusion mechanism remains unclear. A common view is that the complexation energy drives fusion, but how this energy is harvested for fusion is unexplained. Moreover, SNAREs likely fully assemble before fusion. Computer simulation is challenging, as even fast neurotransmitter release at neuronal synapses involves fusion on ms timescales, beyond the scope of atomistic or mildly coarse-grained approaches. Here, we used highly coarse-grained representations, allowing simulation of the ms timescales of physiological SNARE-driven fusion under physiological conditions. Due to constant collisions, the rod-like SNARE complexes spontaneously generated entropic forces ∼8 pN per SNARE that cleared the fusion site and squeezed the membranes with forces ∼19 pN per SNARE, catalyzing a hemifused stalk connection. Regrouping, five or more SNARE complexes exerted entropic tensions 2.5 pN/nm or greater, expanding the stalk into a hemifusion diaphragm (HD), followed by HD rupture and fusion. The entropic forces generated tensions ∼17-21 pN in the SNARE linker domains (LDs). Previous optical tweezer measurements suggest that, on the ms timescales of fusion, these LD tensions are sufficient to unzipper the LDs while leaving the C-terminal domain (CTD) marginally intact, which are both required for fusion. Consistent with a recent magnetic tweezers study, we propose that the CTD may be further stabilized by complexin for robust fusion. Our results explain how SNARE-generated forces fuse membranes and predict that more SNARE complexes exert higher net force so that fusion is faster, consistent with experimental electrophysiological studies at neuronal synapses. Thus, entropic forces evolve SNARE complexes into a fusogenic, partially unzippered state, squeeze membranes for hemifusion, and expand hemifusion connections for fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.