ArticleBMC plant biology2025
High-throughput phenotyping of wheat root angle and coleoptile length at different temperatures using 3D-printed equipment.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-throughput screening of heat stress response in Chinese cabbage (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Unearthing the hidden organ: vital role of the root in drought tolerance of plants.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInnovation in crop establishment is crucial for wheat productivity in drought-prone climates. Seedling establishment, the first stage of crop productivity, relies heavily on root and coleoptile system architecture for effective soil water and nutrient acquisition, particularly in regions practicing deep planting. Root phenotyping methods that quickly determine coleoptile lengths are vital for breeding studies. Traditionally, direct selection for root and coleoptile traits has been limited by the lack of suitable phenotyping methods, genetic and phenotypic complexity, and poor repeatability in sampling. In this study, we innovated a method utilizing 3D printing technology to measure root angle and coleoptile length in wheat seedlings. We evaluated seedlings from eight different wheat genotypes across varying temperatures and validated our findings through image processing techniques.
resultsThe analysis of variance in root architecture revealed significant differences among genotypes for root angle. Temperature treatments also significantly influenced shoot length, number of roots and total root length. The Tosunbey genotypes exhibited the highest root angle and the lowest root angle was observed in Altindane genotypes. Additionally, we observed that increasing the temperature led to an increase in seedling root length. Similarly, the coleoptile architecture analysis showed significant differences among genotypes in coleoptile length, leaf length, number of roots, and total root length. Temperature treatments and deep sowing applications significantly affected these traits as well. The Tosunbey and Müfitbey genotypes exhibited the longest coleoptile length, whereas the Nevzatbey genotype showed the shortest.
conclusionSelecting for a narrow root angle and a high number of seminal roots can result in deeper, more branched root systems. Furthermore, developing wheat genotypes with longer coleoptiles can enhance plant production and early vigor, particularly with deep sowing. Our method, using the eqiupments producing by 3D printing technology enables high-throughput phenotyping of wheat roots and coleoptiles, offering new insights into root and coleoptile system regulation at different temperature conditions. This method can be seamlessly integrated into breeding programs to enhance drought tolerance, rapidly phenotyping populations for root and coleoptile characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.