Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863854›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Prioritizing implementation solutions for the urban family physician policy in Iran: a multi-criteria decision-making study.

Lida Shams, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh, Taha Nasiri, Fatemeh Mohammadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lida ShamsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-8844
Mohammadreza MobinizadehNational Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-3744
Taha NasiriDepartment of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-6920
Fatemeh MohammadiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammadi.fatemeh63@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5590-9294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily physician program is one of the effective reforms of the health system in Iran, but despite the implementation of this program in rural areas and the passage of ten years since its implementation in two provinces of Fars and Mazandaran, its implementation has faced problems. The aim of this study is to identify and prioritize implementation solutions related to the challenges of the family physician program in Iran.

methodsThis is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 22 snowball-sampled experts and managers of basic health insurers to extract problems and executive solutions through coding and data analysis using Atlas Ti software and content analysis in the first stage. The combined criteria were used to report qualitative studies (COREQ). In the second stage, the extracted executive solutions were ranked using multi-criteria decision-making (MADM) and a hybrid approach combining Shannon entropy with simple aggregation weighting (SAW).

resultsMain themes were identified, including financing, management, human resources, structure, culture building, payment mechanism information systems, monitoring & control, performance of insurance organisations, and implementation. Out of these, priority was given to the information system, along with 41 sub-themes prioritising comprehensive, community-oriented physician training.

conclusionThe findings of the study provide remedies for the problems of the Iranian Urban Family Physician Programme at the executive level and in priority order, from the standpoint of the insurance organisations. Making crucial decisions entails handling matters relating to funding, administration, personnel, architecture, ethos, remuneration, IT systems, oversight, insurance organization output, and execution.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth PolicyPhysicians, FamilyUrban Health ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicIranQualitative ResearchHealth SystemMulti-criteria decision making- IranUrban family physician

Identifiers

PMID39863854
PMCPMC11762911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.