Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863815›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone before cochlear implantation for pre-operative prediction of chorda tympani nerve management and round window access.

Fatma Boubaker, Ulysse Puel, Sara Imbs, Gabriela Hossu, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Michael Eliezer, Cécile Parietti-Winkler, Romain Gillet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anatomical Characteristics of the Facial Nerve in Patients With Cochlear Hypoplasia.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fatma BoubakerGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Ulysse PuelGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Sara ImbsGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Gabriela HossuUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM, IADI, Nancy, 54000, France.
Alain BlumGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Pedro Augusto Gondim TeixeiraGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Michael EliezerDepartment of Radiology, Hospital des 15-20, Paris, 75571, France.
Cécile Parietti-WinklerENT Surgery Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France.
Romain GilletGuilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, University Hospital Center of Nancy, Nancy, 54000, France. r.gillet@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1350-1694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo evaluate various anatomical parameters and their relationship to chorda tympani nerve (CTN) injury and round window (RW) access during cochlear implantation. MATERIALS AND

methodsUltra-high-resolution CT images of 66 patients were retrospectively reviewed and compared with operative reports. The facial recess and the round window were analyzed, mainly using the chorda-facial angle (CFA), the width of the facial recess, the CTN-tympanic annulus distance, the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle, and the type of RW.

resultsSurgical management of the CTN was uneventful in 59 patients, whereas surgical difficulty occurred in 7, with significant differences only between the CTN-tympanic annulus distance and the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle (P ≤ 0.04). The optimal cut-off values for predicting surgical difficulty were 0.95 mm and 19°, respectively, with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 0.71, 0.67, 0.2 and 0.95 for the distance, and 0.57, 0.95, 0.57 and 0.94 for the angle, respectively. The RW was accessible in 51 patients and cochleostomy was performed in 15 patients, without significant difference between radiological parameters, especially concerning the CFA.

conclusionA CTN-tympanic annulus distance greater than 0.95 mm may help to predict a non-negligible risk of CTN surgical damage, and a RW thinner than 1.85 mm may require exploring the possibility of a cochleostomy approach.

Indexed as

Chorda Tympani NerveCochlear ImplantationFacial Nerve InjuriesRound Window, EarTemporal BoneTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareChorda Tympani nerveCochlear implantsComputed tomographyFacial nerveRound windowTemporal bone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.