ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Mechanical Wear of Degraded Articular Cartilage.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the mechanical wear of cartilage with different types of degradation.
methodsBovine osteochondral explants were treated with interleukin-1β (IL-1β) to mimic inflammatory conditions, with chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) to specifically remove glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), or with collagenase to degrade the collagen network during 5 days of culture. Viscoelastic properties of cartilage were characterized via indentation. Biochemical assays were performed to quantify the cartilage matrix loss to the media during culture and from an accelerated, ex vivo wear test. The coefficient of friction during the wear test was measured. Distribution of GAGs in the tissue was assessed histologically.
resultsAll three degradative treatments decreased the cartilage modulus values and depleted GAGs in histological sections. However, wear was not uniform among the different treatments. Collagen loss from the tissue due to mechanical wear was only higher with IL-1β and collagenase treatment, while collagen loss due to wear with ChABC treatment was similar to untreated controls. In addition, less GAG was released due to mechanical wear in all degraded groups than the controls, likely because GAGs had already been depleted from these tissues during culture. As no significant differences in the coefficient of friction were observed between groups, changes in wear were attributed to altered tissue composition and structure rather than to changes in frictional forces.
conclusionsResults suggest that cartilage with a degraded collagen network is more susceptible to mechanical wear, but that cartilage wear may be relatively unaffected by the loss of GAGs. Furthermore, exacerbated mechanical wear could be an additional mechanism by which inflammatory cytokines induce cartilage breakdown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.