Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863775›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2025

Encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Scott Kopetz, Takayuki Yoshino, Eric Van Cutsem, Cathy Eng, Tae Won Kim, Harpreet Singh Wasan, Jayesh Desai, Fortunato Ciardiello, Rona Yaeger, Timothy S Maughan and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04607421 (AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF FIRST-LINE ENCORAFENIB PLUS CETUXIMAB WITH OR WITHOUT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE THERAPY WITH A SAFETY LEAD-IN OF ENCORAFENIB AND CETUXIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN PARTICIPANTS WITH METASTATIC BRAF V600E-MUTANT COLORECTAL CANCER), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04607421 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study of first-line encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without chemotherapy versus standard of care therapy with a safety lead-in of encorafenib and cetuximab plus chemotherapy in participants with metastatic braf v600e-mutant colorectal cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2020 to 2027Enrolled841ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsEncorafenib, Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Leucovorin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRASFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 inThe New England journal of medicine · 2025
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Personalized pharmacotherapy of colorectal cancer].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  13. CDK9 inhibition sensitizes intrinsically resistantActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Updates of CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2026.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Scott KopetzUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. SKopetz@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9647-3416
Takayuki YoshinoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-4756
Eric Van CutsemUniversity Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-1230
Cathy EngVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2335-0612
Tae Won KimAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9522-1997
Harpreet Singh WasanHammersmith Hospital, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-2030
Jayesh DesaiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-9344
Fortunato CiardielloUniversity of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-5540
Rona YaegerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-5454
Timothy S MaughanUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-5065
Elena BeyzarovPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-9432
Xiaoxi ZhangPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9923-9985
Graham FerrierPfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1760-4697
Xiaosong ZhangPfizer, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2415-5355
Josep TaberneroVall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-8139

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on the BEACON phase 3 study. Historically, first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC with chemotherapy regimens has had limited efficacy. The phase 3 BREAKWATER study investigated EC+mFOLFOX6 versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E mCRC. The dual primary endpoint of progression-free survival is event driven; data were not mature at data cutoff. BREAKWATER met the other dual primary endpoint of objective response rate, demonstrating significant and clinically relevant improvement in objective response rate (EC+mFOLFOX6: 60.9%; SOC: 40.0%; odds ratio, 2.443; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.403-4.253; 99.8% CI: 1.019-5.855; one-sided P = 0.0008). Median duration of response was 13.9 versus 11.1 months. At this first interim analysis of overall survival, the hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.318-0.691; repeated CI: 0.166-1.322). Serious adverse event rates were 37.7% versus 34.6%. The safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent. BREAKWATER demonstrated a significantly improved response rate that was durable for first-line EC+mFOLFOX6 versus SOC in patients with BRAF V600E mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04607421 .

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarbamatesCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesAdultAgedFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsBRAF protein, humanCarbamatesCetuximabencorafenibFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID39863775
PMCPMC11922750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.