Residual nitrite and nitrate in processed meats and meat analogues in the United States.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The quality characteristics of air-dried cured meat (Grison) processed from cattle, buffalo, and camel: a comparative study.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
2. Microbiota and quality profiling of fermented goat meat sausages (sucuk) under nitrite-reduced and mixed-culture strategies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
   Article
3. Consumer sensory preferences for processed meats with synthetic, conventional, organic, and deodorized curing ingredients.NPJ science of food · 2025
   Article
4. Impact of Organic and Conventional Vegetable-Based Curing Ingredients on Frankfurter Quality and Sensory Attributes.Food science & nutrition · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as