Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning classification of MGMT status of glioblastomas using multiparametric MRI with a novel domain knowledge augmented mask fusion approach.

İlker Özgür Koska, Çağan Koska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Using MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

İlker Özgür KoskaDepartment of Radiology, Behçet Uz Children's Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. ozgurkoska@yahoo.com.
Çağan KoskaDepartment of Electrical Electronical Engineering, Yaşar University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to build a robust classifier for the MGMT methylation status of glioblastoma in multiparametric MRI. We focused on multi-habitat deep image descriptors as our basic focus. A subset of the BRATS 2021 MGMT methylation dataset containing both MGMT class labels and segmentation masks was used. A comprehensive mask fusion approach was developed to select relevant image crops of diseased tissue. These fusion masks, which were guided by multiple sequences, helped collect information from the regions that seem disease-free to radiologists in standard MRI sequences while harboring pathology. Integrating the information in different MRI sequences and leveraging the high entropic capacity of deep neural networks, we built a 3D ROI-based custom CNN classifier for the automatic prediction of MGMT methylation status of glioblastoma in multi-parametric MRI. Single sequence-based classifiers reached intermediate predictive performance with 0.65, 0.71, 0.77, and 0.82 accuracy for T1W, T2W, T1 contrast-enhanced, and FLAIR sequences, respectively. The multiparametric classifier using T1 contrast-enhanced and FLAIR images reached 0.88 accuracy. The accuracy of the four-input model that used all sequences was 0.81. The best model reached 0.90 ROC AUC value. Integrating human knowledge in the form of relevant target selection was a useful approach in MGMT methylation status prediction in MRI. Exploration of means to integrate radiology knowledge into the models and achieve human-machine collaboration may help to develop better models. MGMT methylation status of glioblastoma is an important prognostic marker and is also important for treatment decisions. The preoperative non-invasive predictive ability and the explanation tools of the developed model may help clinicians to better understand imaging phenotypes of MGMT methylation status of glial tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGlioblastomaMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingTumor Suppressor ProteinsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningGlioblastomaMGMT methylationModel explanation

Identifiers

PMID39863759
PMCPMC11762293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.