SynthesisEuropean radiology2025
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of non-contrast MR angiography and planar V/Q scintigraphy for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of non-contrast magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (NC-MRPA) and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND
methodsSystematic searches of electronic databases were conducted from 2000 to 2024. Primary outcomes were per-patient sensitivity and specificity of NC-MRPA and V/Q scintigraphy. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using a random-effect analysis. Summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were obtained.
resultsA total of 3709 studies (1941 NC-MRPA studies) were identified through systematic searches, with eight published MRI and nine published V/Q investigations meeting inclusion criteria. The results showed that NC-MRPA had a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91) and specificity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98), yielding an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96). V/Q scanning had a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.91), yielding an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91). The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic tests for V/Q scans (34.7%, 95% CI: 30.8-38.7) was greater than that of NC-MRPA studies (3.31%, 95% CI: 1.65-4.97).
conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that NC-MRPA is more specific than V/Q scintigraphy for the detection of PE, with comparable accuracy and sensitivity. NC-MRPA yielded fewer non-diagnostic scans than V/Q scintigraphy and is a feasible alternative imaging modality for diagnosing PE in patients for whom intravenous contrast administration poses a substantive risk. KEY POINTS: Question V/Q lung scintigraphy has been used as a reserve, alternative modality for patients who cannot undergo CT pulmonary angiography. Findings Non-contrast MR angiography (MRA) is a feasible alternative for diagnosing PE in patients for whom intravenous iodinated contrast administration poses a substantial risk. Clinical relevance Non-contrast MRA provides similar sensitivity and superior specificity to V/Q scintigraphy for diagnosing PE, without ionizing radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39863727What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.